If you actually want to rank your site first on Google and have it be mentioned or recommended or or cited by LLMs like JGPT, Purple XY Grock or Google Reviews, well, you have to be doing SEO in this whole new way. And this is something super new. Like about a month or two ago, this wasn't a thing.
This is just right now new information. And I want to explain to you exactly step by step what this new way of doing SEO is and how you can do it too with live real examples and data to back it up. So let's get to it. Okay, we have a lot to cover. So let's just get going. So I want to go over exactly what this new way of doing SEO is.
How do you actually do it, data to back this up with real life examples of people actually doing it, including ourselves, and then give you some templates. In other words, going to give you exactly what you need to do to start doing SEO with this new way. So, first things first, what is this new way of doing SEO? And again, I don't use the word new lightly. It's literally the new way. And honestly, the only way if you're still doing it like you did like a couple weeks ago, you're just going to get left behind. Okay, so this new way is using original data and or very important right here, non-commodized information that adds something to the web.
In other words, if you actually want to rank on Google, if you actually want to get mentioned by LLMs like Chat GPT, Purple XTI, Grock, Claude, any LLM, even Google's AML, you have to be doing this. Here's proof. Google said it two weeks ago in their their GEO guide. They launched a GEO guide, a generative engine optimization guide, excuse me. I made a video on that. I'll link it in the description. But a couple things stand out just to like recap what we talked about last week, right? Two things mainly. Um, in order to create these non-commodity type of content, in other words, creating the content that actually ranks, content that actually like provides value and gets cited by LM as well, right? There's two main things you need to do. First, it's providing a unique point of view, right? Don't just recycle what others on the internet have to say or said or could easily be produced by a generative AI model. Why? Because if I can click a button and produce a piece of content, so can you. So can all of your competitors.
So that becomes irrelevant, becomes a commodity. And commodities will not rank because why would they? If they're a commodity, Google's AI mode will just reply. For example, if I go here and type in uh how tall is the Eiffel Tower like it's right here. I don't need to click any of these sites right here because this is a commodity, right? Same thing for can dogs eat strawberries. Boom. Right here. Yes. Why would I click any of these guys right here? I already have my answer. It's a commodity piece of content, right? So going that route doesn't make any sense. Again, if it's easily produced by a generative AI model, Google's going to do it. So, why would you want to do it yourself, Google's always going to win? It's always going to show theirs in front of yours. And second thing, creating non-commodity content that's helpful, reliable, and people first. And they give you an example like commodity content, for example, something like seven tips for firsttime home buyers is often based on common knowledge, which could originate from anyone, and typically adds little unique insights for readers.
In contrast, non-commodity content such as why we wave the inspection is and save money a look inside the sewer line provides unique expert or experienced takes that go beyond common knowledge and the ordinary. Now these two both these two articles this one and this one are optimized to rank for the same keywords right the literally this one and this one right here the seven tips and the why we have the inspection right these two are optimized sort of to rank for the same keywords that said this one is never going to rank because it's common knowledge right doesn't add anything to the web but this one will more on that in a bit okay I want to I want to cover this uh in depth and it's this is going to be super interesting trust me then second thing they said just to recap what we talked about last week What about AEO and GO? AO stands for answer engine optimization and go stands for generative engine optimization.
These are both terms you may see used to describe work specifically focused on improving visibility in AI search experiences. From Google search perspective, optimizing for narrative AI search is optimizing for search experience. That's still SEO. In other words, AO, GO, AO, however you want to call it there. It's just SEO as we've been saying for a long time. Now, how do you do this, right? How do you actually get get this done? Well, you do it by with, excuse me, unique data and perspective variables.
Again, how do you do how do you create the type of content Google wants you to create? In other words, using original data and or non-commodized information that adds something to the web that in turn will actually rank on Google and actually get cited and surfaced by LMS. Well, you do it with unique data and perspective variables. Now, what does this mean? I have a lot of examples here. I I have four examples right here. I'll start with the second one. This is two out of four. It's this right here. Okay. So, example, let's say I own an e-commerce store and I'm targeting the keyword best protein powder for women. Okay. Now, the commodity version of this, right? If I wanted to rank for this keyword, a commodity piece of content would be just another affiliate listical ranking 12 pers, which is saturated, deval, and you're competing with Aline basically.
Now, if we don't do this and instead add these variables, these three, like for example, for example, proprietary data, which is the variable proprietary data, we surveyed 2,300 of our subscribers on bloating. What we tested ran eight popular powders through a third party lab for actual protein content versus label and then third variable and expected finding two mark leaders were 18% under the the claim protein. So again, this is our target keyword. Before we used to write this, but now we won't do it. We're going to add these three variables. And what does it produce? Well, it produces a piece of content called we lab tested eight protein powders. Two big names were underdosed. Now, this article right here will target the same keywords as a listical with 12 powers, right? For example, again, 12 best powers, one yours, second one your another one third. Right? This article right here, which again is titled 12 best power of Roman, whatever, it's going to be targeting the same keywords as this one, but this one's going to rank. Why? Because it has three variables that have data, right? Three variables with with data data or or unique perspective.
Doesn't really matter. It's both, right? So, we're basically taking an article that was a commodity, but because we're including variables, it stops being a commodity. Now, these variables can be anything you want, and I'll give you more examples. So, this makes sense. But in this case, if I'm an e-commerce store, I have access to all these three variables, right? Even I can just even add one, right? I can just add this one or this one. I don't have to add all three. I can just add one and it's already not a commodity piece of content. And this is literally a link bait and AI session gold. It's templated for a store owner who has order data and product as access. Excuse me.
Most bloggers don't. Okay. Now, these articles right here, the uh 12 best Jesus 12 best protein powders for women. And then it's like just a listical with images and links, right? This used to work. Not anymore. Okay? And because anyone can do this literally AI can do this. I I have no idea about this stuff. I'm not into this niche. I can ask AI to do this or I can even make it up myself. That's why it's a commodity and that's why it won't rank. What will rank is if you own an actual store and have actual order data or or product data. Most bloggers or most AI doesn't, right? You can make a a piece of content that targets the same keywords as the commodity version of articles, but it's going to rank because it's a non-commodity piece of content.
Hopefully, that made sense. Let me give you another example right here. For example, uh best robot vacuums. Okay, look at the the search engine ranking pages for this, right? There's this uh vacuum wars uh site, then there's New York Times, then there's this random blog, then there's Reddit, then there's PC Mag, then there's Amazon. Okay, the actual website marketplace where you can buy the product is last. Okay, so starting from the top, right? Reason why these guys rank even though that DR their DR is 55.
The New York Times DR is 94, right? These random blog is 34, Reddit DR is 95, PC Magazine DR is 91 and Amazon is 93. So even though these guys have the lowest DR without counting with these ones, right, they rank above it. Why? Because it's real data from product testing. This right here, right, this article from the New York Times, it's decent, but it's not the best. It's just literally a listical with some random links to affiliate programs, right? That's what it is. Cuz why would the New York Times even be qualified to write this, right? They're not more qualified than these guys that only talk about these the New York Times are a newspaper.
These guys, they'll leave and breathe uh vacuum robot uh reviews, right? This why would this random guy be ranking right here? because he wrote an in-depth article on why he thinks that that's the best robot testing with videos, suction, uh, battery life, water, whatever. It's very in-depth, right? Why is Red right here? Well, Red has a DR of 95 and it's good because it's real user data, right? It Reddit is filled with like real user data from real humans, real people commenting. That being said, in my opinion, the reason why it ranks below uh these guys right here is because it's just not the best display of information. It's not not really user friendly.
So, if you're wanting to know like what's the best vacuum robots, I don't think in my opinion that you want to be scrolling through Reddit comments and and maybe seeing something that's like insulting cuz like it's like it's not the best user experience in my opinion, right? It's it's it's literally a forum. Okay. Um then we have PC Mag with a VR of 91. This is literally just an affiliate listing article basing products based off of how much commission they earn and just publicly available reviews.
So, this adds nothing to the web or at least very little. Uh, and then there's Amazon, okay, the actual product listing from shop that are sorted by buyers u based on buyers experiences. So, hopefully looking at this this uh SER this search engine ranking page, you guys can see how this works. Again, why are these guys ranking above it? Because it has real data from product testing, right? These guys rank above New York Times. So it's not about DR is lower. These guys the R is 34. Yet they rank above Reddit, uh PC Mag, and Amazon. Why? Because it's actual tangible data. Now, you don't have to go overboard with the data. Like as I said, like it just has to be data, unique data, like numbers or a a unique perspective. Like even if you don't measure stuff, you can just say, "Hey, I tried this and based on what I think, based on my opinion, this sucks. This doesn't."
And it's that exact opinion AI doesn't have because AI can't test vacuum robots. AI can't test software. AI can't do real stuff. Okay. Now, we still have a lot to cover. I want to give you more and more examples. I gave you just one for e-commerce store. I have ones for agencies, local businesses. I want to give you all these examples so you guys have as much context as you can. Now, important. Notice that there are no actual stores like brands ranking in the first page because no brands that sell these these robot vacuums actually talk about how good or bad their products are and stack them against the competition. They should though. So again, don't we don't see any robot vacuum brands. If I was to be a robot vacuum brand, I'd want to rank first right here for this keyword, of course, right? It's just as if I if I was typing best um AI SEO agency, I would want to rank first as well, right? It's it's obvious, okay? It's my my money keyword, but they don't. And the reason why they don't is is because they don't talk about the products enough.
They just have the the product listing page and that's it, right? There's no actual reviews, no actual testing. There's none of that. Okay? In most of them at least. Here's a perfect example. It's it's PayPal versus Wise. I've given this example a lot of times. I'll give it once again. If I type in, for example, uh how much are PayPal's fees to send money, right? Sure, PayPal shows up first, but then who shows up next? It's a competitor.
A competitor a competitor, right? All these are PayPal's competitors. And the reason why they show up in in some instances even first, actually, I think in the AMO they even show up first, right? Is because, right, there you go. Wise shows up first as a listing. Wise. Okay. So even though uh they're targeting a branded competitor's keyword, right, PayPal's fees, why would Wise, which is a direct competitor of PayPal, make a page dedicated to a competitor's fees and make a whole calculator that's interactive, proper content, like proper valuable talking about the competition. Well, it's because if they talk about the competition well enough, in fact, if they talk about the competition better than the competition talks about themselves, they can outrank them. And the whole goal is saying, "Hey, by the way, here's how much PayPal's fees are, but if you use us, you save 5x on fees, right? Same thing." And this that's also being picked up by the LMS, right? Right here.
Note, for international transfers involving currency corrosion, PayPal also charges a 3 to 4% conversion market fee, which Wise doesn't. And again, Wise is producing content about their competitors, but because they have a better product, they can afford to do so because they can sit here all day and say, "Hey, by the way, here's what PayPal charges, but we charge way less." So point being is that right here the brand shouldn't be afraid of reviewing their products of putting out original data of putting out original perspectives if their products are good. Now let's say for example your product isn't the best in the market right let's say if you were to do the proper testings the data would be uh not favorable to you can always skew the data not lie but skew the data to only include variables again variables that could be um actual data or or or human perspective that skew the data towards your site only focus on the ones you're better at. Right? Even if there's like 100 data points and even if you're only better in one, talk about that one, right? In theory, you're worse than all of them because in the other 99 points, you're you're worse, but just focus on that one, which might be enough.
Hopefully, it's making sense so far. Okay? And by the way, same thing applies here uh in the AI mode. Best vacuum robots. Look who cited over and over again. It's this brand right here because again, they go highly in-depth and reviewing viewing robots and uh actual data, actual testing. And actually, I click show right here. These guys right here. Again, they go in depth on all the robots. If you click here to jump more details, there's even video reviews over every single one, key features, man. It's it's super in-depth. The guys go go aggressively reviewing these robots and making sure that they test them across the board in anything they can. Okay, so that's why they're outranking New York Times. They're ranking Amazon, which is actually like a product listing website because Google values um real data, real perspective. Even if you were to ask AI to make, hey AI, make me a listical for the best.
Make me an article that ranks for the best vacuum core robots. Well, you're never going to rank because that's a commodity and you can press a button and do it and I can press a button and do it as well. Okay. Now, there's some nuance here, okay, which I mentioned right here below, which is something that's considered commodity information in some industries can be valuable in others simply because there might not be enough content covering it to have it be a commodity. For example, a top 10 best protein powders to gain muscle can be a commodity piece of content, but a top 10 human robots for cleaning isn't because there's not enough content out there about it. So, your content slop isn't slop because it adds value. While the same exact article in another niche wouldn't add any value because there's already enough content talking about it and nothing new you can bring to the table. Unless, of course, you do what I said above, which is adding your variables inside.
Now, by the way, when I say slop right here, I don't mean AI slop. The issue here isn't that AI wrote the content. That's not an issue. It's it's not an issue at all. Right? The issue is regardless if it was AI, a human, a dog, a dolphin, I don't care. If any of these individuals, humans, dogs, dolphins, or AI, wrote a piece of content that doesn't add anything to the web, it's called slop. Again, slop isn't AI slop. Slop is something written by someone or something that adds no value to the web. So again I I said it again AI isn't the issue. Humans can write slop if what they write adds nothing to the web and so can AI but so can AI and humans write non-slop. So it's the way in which you use AI or your human hands I guess to write content by adding again unique data and perspective variables. Now let me give you another example right here um before I jump to the other ones. This is in the same same um same realm uh just two different paths. So again the same keyword best protein powder for women and the commodity version the affiliate listical ranking for powders eterated developed competitor quitting with healthline. Now there's two path you can go can you go the light path or or the heavy path.
Okay path is the low friction forcing variable everyone can feel from memory every brand basically with your research which is called the what you see variable which basically is the number one thing our customers asks when is whether the protein actually matches the label. So this is the variable. Okay. The number one thing our customers ask is whether the protein actually match the label. What does this produce? Like what if you add this variable what you see to your article, right? It produces the question every woman asks before buying a protein and the honest answer. It's a field inside piece built from what you genuinely see across your customers of your brand. No d required, but it's firsthand and original. So it still beats the commodity listical. So again, no need to like go and do deep research on your brand. No, it's still firsthand and original, right? So, it beats again the commodity article, but it's it's there's no proprietary data required. Okay, so again, that's why I said right here, it's data or perspective variables. Now, data in my opinion is better, but if you don't have it, not an issue. Okay, and then you can go with the heavy path, which which is with two more hardcore variables, right? For the users or the e-commerce brands want to go deeper. So, what do you see? Same as above. Okay. And a hard number. So, we lab tested eight powders.
Two market leaders were 18% under air clean protein. So it produces we labap test and eight powers. Two big names were underdisclosed. So again same template same person two effort levels. The one who will never run a lab test still gets a non-commodity article right here. Okay. If you don't want to run a lab test you still get a non-commodity article. The one who will gets the killer version. That's the wholeing principle. One low friction forcing variable nobody can dodge and one optional happy variable that rewards effort. Hopefully this made sense. Again, we're adding and sprinkling in variables through the content and through either putting them into AI to generate them for us or with the human, but I'll go over the generation after. Now, hopefully this is making sense so far, and if it is, please comment the words SEO uh so that I know that this is making sense so far and also get some engagement. Now, here's the four templates.
Now, we went over this one right here. We went over went over template number two which is the original data study which is again best for e-commerce SAS agencies and media companies anyone sitting on data orders surveys internal metrics or willing to gather some and the forcing output excuse me input is a data source a headline finding and this builds a linkbait and AI citation magnet okay now let's go over template number one okay which is called case study or how we got X result this is best for SAS companies agencies service based businesses and anyone with a real outcome. Okay. And the forcing input is a concrete result plus what they did differently. Let's go here. Template number one. Okay. And again, this works for all these types of business right here. SAS, agency, users business, business, but I'll just go I have actually choose one. Okay. So, I'll just do with SAS. Okay. So, case study template, right? Target keyword. Does AI generated content actually drive traffic? The commodity version. Another can AI rank content rank. Here's what Google has to say. It's rehash. It's remixing the search guidelines. and then 10 other blog posts, no original data, comparing competing headto-head with Samrush, Adri's blogs, saturated and exactly the kind of content that the main update develops.
Why would you want to do this? Like here's what Google has to say. If I don't know what Google has to say, I just go into Google's blog and I read that. Okay, so again adds no value. So how do we make sure that this adds value? How to make sure that we produce a non-commodity version? Well, we force these variables. Topic, data source, headline finding. So topic could be for example uh how much organic traffic AI generated articles actually drive for SAS and agencies uh data source our own platform data across X sites running out of blog plus a survey of X users and headline finding X% of organic traffic came from 12% of publish articles most articles drove almost nothing while a small group drove the majority so what does this produce it produces an article called we analyze X sites running AI autoblogs 7% of the traffic came from 12% of articles. Okay, so again, we're producing the commodity article and this right here are basically targeting the same keywords, but this one won't rank and this one will because it adds something to the web. It adds real data, real experience based on the variables we chose.
This is again a link bait and AI session gold for the exact reason the protein powder one was. Except here the mode is even stronger. The data is Arvo's own platform data. No competitor can replicate it because no one else has visibility across thousands of AI published sites. It's the single most defensible data study in your niche and it doubles as a sale argument. The takeaway naturally points to consistency. The right structure is what separates% at work which is what ARO does. So the contrast notice basically the commodity version sites other people's stats. This version is the stat everyone else will site. That's the whole information gain difference in one piece.
And I'll show you a literally an example right here. If you go to arvel.com/blog, scroll down right here. There you go. AI content detector report. So we we made a report a data report with real research data, right? Uh that we did, right? This is getting it's not only is it in in depth report again with variables that got us this data, right? It's actual valuable and it's right now. Let me see if I can find it right here. It's getting links on autopilot. I think it's this one right here. The Yeah, there you go. Uh yeah, 32 back. This is basically again a marking statistics. We made a whole uh data data piece of content with that aggregate data from across the web and add also added our own data inside of it. Okay. And we got 32 back links without paying for a single one. And a lot of them are actually high valuable backlinks, right? The R82, the R72, the R67, the R505, 59. So powerful. Point being is that, and I made a video on this, like producing highquality content, non-commoded content, not only will make it rank, but also get you links because people love to link to these stuff.
Now, hopefully this is making sense so far. Again, the idea is that you add variables into your content, right? That make it a non commodity. And I'll even show you another example right here um of one that I did like a couple hours ago using Arvo itself using this exact same same template right here. Content campaigns log generations. Open this up right here. This is all done with AI. 73% of organic traffic comes from just 12% of AI generated articles. And this is done while we AI even did the graphs, right? This graph is based off of the data from the title. 73% 73% 12% 12%. Again, AI made this image, nailed the the the text, nailed every single thing right based on my article title.
AI did all this stuff done for me. Um, broad keywords, high intent keywords. It's properly done a proper piece of content. Here's another one right here again. And this seems like it's underwhelming. Firstly, it's not uh because it looks just looks great. Added all this stuff right here. Internal images in uh internal links, external links, bullets, tables, quotes, videos. There's all this stuff right here. And then this actually will rank because it has proprietary data or experience that if someone doing and targeting the same keywords that we're targeting in these articles, right, would not really have the chance to rank because again would be just slop. And again, not slop because it's N byI, but slop because it has no value to the web. And by the way, I wanted to show you this later, but the way I do this is by adding these templates right here. I have this template right here with all my variables right here.
Topic variable, result achieve variable, what we do differently variable, and then I sprinkle the variables right here within uh the marine outline of my content. There's a bunch of templates right here with all them with different variables. But I'll show you this in a bit. Point being is that this is the new way to produce content. Now, here's the one for template number three. Uh which is we covered this one, we covered this one. Number three is firsthand review. I actually tested it. So, it's best for e-commerce affiliates, reviewers, operators, anyone who generally used the thing. Okay? And so, again, I'll just use it for local businesses. Okay? But again, the template is the same. Um, this is the niche that tests the thesis because a plumber doesn't have a data study, but they have something better, volume of lived experience. So, target keyword, uh, why is my water bill so high? Commodity version, a generic checklist on AI spits that AI spits out. Uh, how do you make it commodity? until you add the variables first and story specific mistake and what I tell every customer and this could be for example first story could be I found I found the cause of 400 plus call call out seven times out of 10 it's the same silent toilet flapper specific mistake home owners replace the whole toilet with with $4 fix part fixes it um customer the die toilet tests you can do before calling me and what it produces again produces after 400 high water bill call out here's the $4 part that actually blame and again a solid face person with zero data and infrastructure can fill this. The input is in their head, not a spreadsheet. So there you go. Even if you're a plumber, dentist, lawyer that has no data, you can still add variables because again the variables are based off unique data or perspective or experience. Okay? Doesn't have to be boring spreadsheet numbers. Okay? And by the way, all these templates, right, as I said before, are by default in your RVO account. Template one, template 3, four, template 2, all them are here.
If you load your account count all them will be right here and again all them with all the variables already included right here right in the proper thing and right here neart online out online. Now what this is bas by by the way like this is the um generation prompt to generate the article. Okay and this is the outline telling you hey start with a title then put an image then put a table then put another paragraph. Basically this tells you how how the article looks like. You can change this around if you guys want. Uh basically this gives you the structure of the article. say, "Hey, start with a title, then add a table, then add two images, then a paragraph with four four um 400 words, then whatever." So, again, you can tailor this however you want it. It's infinitely customizable. And then, if you want to use the template, just click here, template, add your variables right here. Hit add article. It will generate something like you just saw before. This right here is going to be generated based off of that article template. It will add the images, the links, the videos, and of course, it will pull in the data from the variables you fill in right here. Templates one, two, three, and four. All them preloaded in your account, which again are these exact templates right here. And let's go with the last one. Template number uh four right here, which is the contrarian opinion. This works best for coaches, agencies, founders, and consultants. Anyone with a defensible point of view. And again, same thing. Let's see.
The keyword is cold is cold email that wishy-washy it depends. Post the edges both sides. Well, how do you convert this into something actually valable? Well, you add the variables position. why consensus is wrong and evidence from your work. Again, I want to go over this. You can just pause the video and read this, but it's the same thing over and over again. You're adding variables to uh make the content more valuable. And by the way, the pattern across all four of these is the same. The format changes per niche, but the mechanism is identical. The variable isn't the topic, it's the evidence that the user brings. And the realism test passes in every case, including the local business one, as long as the prompts are written to pull experience, not just that. Again, here in the local business one, you think, "Yeah, but a plumber has no data." Sure, doesn't matter. They have experience, right? They know it better than anyone else. They don't even have a spreadsheet. They don't need to have a spreadsheet. Excuse me. They don't have to have like numbers and data.
They have experience that can be translated into a variable, okay? A firsthand story, a specific mistake they know people make, what they tell every customer after every call, right? It's experience they save in their brain and they can just go here and fill it out in their uh in their template right here and have Arvo produce the content for them. Okay, that's the cool thing about this. Again, we're using AI to produce the content, but it's not slop because we're adding variables onto it. We're adding proprietary data experience. Okay, that's the difference. And by the way, like I made it, I made this table right here. You guys can can screenshot it if you guys want, right? That goes over every single variable that's inside of each one of the templates right there as you saw. Okay, these right here, all these variables right there, right? And then it goes over as well uh as um examples. So, the topic is an example what you could do there. proton powder those accuracy. Okay, so this is basically a cheat sheet going over how you'd uh use and because if you open this up right here, maybe you're not really sure what to put right here. Okay, so this cheat sheet basically tells you exactly what to put it with some examples on what to do.
That being said, I really recommend that before you try this out right here. Click the article templates and actually see and read through, okay, what's the generation prompt? Tweak it if you guys want, right? And read through the outline because you might want to change things. You might want to have three H3s when you might want to have more images. You might want to have a table. So just go here and say, "Hey, add a table right here." So you might want to do this. Again, this will depend on what you want. This is the basic template, which is amazing enough, good enough, but might maybe you want might want some more words. So you do okay 5,000 10,000 words. Maybe you want more like in article images. So instead of just two in article images, maybe you want 10. Okay, maybe you want to have 10 internal links. So again, maybe you want a video. Uh add an in article video. Okay, maybe you want this. Again, you can tweak the prompt as you want. Again, this is the generation prompt. Okay, so you tell AI what the content is going to be about where you put your variables, but then the actual structure is done right here. Okay, but again, you might want to change this if you guys want uh to tweak what I've put right here. Uh if not, well, no worries. You can just use the default ones.
But this table right here will give you some insights on how to use and what to put in each one of the variables. And that's in essence it. Again, we're producing non-commoded content using AI by adding unique data and perspective variables. And then by the way, you can have AI automatically like run these on autopilot. You can just create what we call an automatic blog right here. Uh enable auto blog full automation mode. Hit continue. And then you can have AI produce however many articles you want and publish them straight to your site every day, week, hour, every month. Okay? And you can just have this run on autopilot. You connect Aro right here straight with your website. It's going to do the cure research. It's going to do the generation of the content. It's going to be doing the automatic publishing of content straight to your site. All these articles posted straight to your site. And if we expand in one of these articles, all of them are going to have a featured image, a table of contents, proper content structure with in article images, in article videos, bullets, tables, quotes, uh internal link. So these articles will be interlin between each other in a way that makes sense.
External links linking out to Wikipedia out external authority sources. All this in for you automatically. In fact, don't forget that you can connect this uh straight with any of these CMSs. We connect directly with any of these sites. So you can have you connect with Shopify, WordPress, Wix, web lovable. We even have an API so you can connect basically anything you want. Um there's a couple more things here in the growth tab. For example, the backlink exchange feature. This you just set this up once and it's going to be automatically building backlinks for you on autopilot. Since I have this enabled, I have enabled this May 1st. It's built me 46 backlinks from 28 unique domains. And actually one of these links right here, I'll quickly show you right here comes from a DR71 domain. There you go. I think it's this one right here. There you go. DR71 domain. So, I got this link for free from a real site with real matrix, uh, real traffic, US-based traffic, a real business, a real brand in the same niche as mine. And I got it for free using the backlink exchange just by having this enabled.
I can also track my brand across LM. I can see, okay, does Arvo, my brand, get mentioned across the LMS? If so, like what's the sentiment? If they're mentioning my brand, how are they what are they saying good or bad things about me? I can track as many prompts as I want. I can add them right here. for example from the prompt how to use uh excuse me um let's see best autoblogging software for SEO I can click this I can see okay hm my brand is mentioned across all these not in perplexity but I can see further okay where is my brand mentioned okay they're mentioned right here so I can see I have a visual data on where my brand is mentioned for which prompt is mentioned for and the sentiment if it's positive if it's negative for example for the prompt is ARO the best AI SEO software of course we show up of course on all these elements because it's a branded prompt but um Grog has a negative ative sentiment. So I can go here and I can say okay hm why is there negative sentiment towards ARO? What are the sources that are saying bad things about us and can we even change those sources or write new sources to change the sentiment of the LLM? Again, you can't improve what you don't measure. And this is a great way to measure this stuff. You can even add your competitor sites and track their prompts if you guys want. So that's pretty cool.
There's even the setup optimizer which basically finds issues on your site across all these data points. It finds what the issues are, tells you what they are, tells you why they're wrong, and there's a button to fix them for you automatically if you guys want. So, we don't you don't even have to log into your site to fix it for you. Now, again, Aru does a lot. I don't want to bore you with this stuff. If you want to exactly see why it works, if you scroll down on the home page, there's a long demo video going over every single feature, not just every feature, but how it works and why it works that way. Or in every single feature page, uh there's a little demo video going over exactly how that certain feature works.
For example, here the um set optimizer will go I go over like uh the issues it finds and you can hit apply to fix those issues for you automatically. So again, if you want to learn exactly what RO does, please check all the feature pages because they break down exactly in depth uh what every single feature does. That's it. This is the new way on how to do SEO. Um it just is you just have to do it. And if you guys want to hire me and my team to do it for you, you just go to arvo.com/call. It's going to be the very first link in the description. You can just go go here to resources, hire us, and I guarantee a 25% increase in Google traffic in 90 days or you don't pay. So, I'm going to leave a link for the description this if you guys want to work with us uh to do all this stuff for you.
That said, if you're still here, please comment the words SEO so that I know that you made it this far. And so, this helps with the YouTube algorithm as well. The more comments we have, the more YouTube pushes out the video to more people. So, if you can do me a YouTube favor and comment the words SEO, that'll be amazing. If you want me to do your SEO for you, well, check this out as well right here. And if you're still here, click here to watch this one next. Thank you so much for Reading and I'll catch you on the next one. Bye.
No comments:
Post a Comment